Re: A thread not about casting
Posted: June 10th, 2019, 12:24 am
Yea, reported it to ATL staff bc they're a demise emulator.The Silvertiger wrote:Much love Eos!
Nice bug find Jose! Can you report it to OSI?
A Mondain's Legacy era Ultima Online freeshard.
https://uogdemise.com/community/
Yea, reported it to ATL staff bc they're a demise emulator.The Silvertiger wrote:Much love Eos!
Nice bug find Jose! Can you report it to OSI?
He literally found a bug that 2/5 doesn't have the same mechanics as 2/6... Why the sass? Give him a pat on the back.Arden wrote:Yah let’s report to osi that their casting is wrong. And not true “Demise osi casting” bc eos says so.
I’ll hit up my boys at EA games and send them this fourm and MBs biased discord in case they need more info to get their casting fixed
Not true... eos checked.Loler wrote:Dg nailed it. But there's more wrong with the casting then just that. Delayed spell damage is still off. Overcasting penalty is still to aggressive. (Time to cast after finishing a spell is to long)
Yea, osi is a pretty shitty demise emulator :/Arden wrote:Not true... eos checked.Loler wrote:Dg nailed it. But there's more wrong with the casting then just that. Delayed spell damage is still off. Overcasting penalty is still to aggressive. (Time to cast after finishing a spell is to long)
Demise casting is correct and OSI’s casting is wrong and and buggy. Get with the program here
Cry me a river. It's kinda funny that Josh actually proves that OSI casting is buggy, but is in denial.Josh wrote:Yea, osi is a pretty shitty demise emulator :/Arden wrote:Not true... eos checked.Loler wrote:Dg nailed it. But there's more wrong with the casting then just that. Delayed spell damage is still off. Overcasting penalty is still to aggressive. (Time to cast after finishing a spell is to long)
Demise casting is correct and OSI’s casting is wrong and and buggy. Get with the program here
You're retarded. It bugged out on osi at one point, but that was just the steam macro bc I've had it do that shit on many many servers where the targeting bugs out (when afk macroing skills). If you watch it says "target canceled" which is when a spell is successfully cast and then you cast another spell without selecting a target.The Silvertiger wrote:Cry me a river. It's kinda funny that Josh actually proves that OSI casting is buggy, but is in denial.Josh wrote:Yea, osi is a pretty shitty demise emulator :/Arden wrote:
Not true... eos checked.
Demise casting is correct and OSI’s casting is wrong and and buggy. Get with the program here
I'm retarded and I thought you liked that kinda thing...Josh wrote:You're retarded. It bugged out on osi at one point, but that was just the steam macro bc I've had it do that shit on many many servers where the targeting bugs out (when afk macroing skills). If you watch it says "target canceled" which is when a spell is successfully cast and then you cast another spell without selecting a target.The Silvertiger wrote:Cry me a river. It's kinda funny that Josh actually proves that OSI casting is buggy, but is in denial.Josh wrote: Yea, osi is a pretty shitty demise emulator :/
My video shows the difference in 2/6 on osi and demise. I think it's pretty clear that demise was eating some spells while the osi one wasn't, which the likely reason is the overcast penalty is slightly too high on demise for 2/6.
2/5 seems accurate, i said that before.
And get off my dick.
no, 2/5 isnt better than 2/6 on osi. 2/5 is better than i thought for sure, that i admitted. The last video shows clearly that 2/5 is inferior to 2/6 when timed properly. Also add on what DG said, it would also make 2/6 better than 2/5The Silvertiger wrote:I'm retarded and I thought you liked that kinda thing...Josh wrote:You're retarded. It bugged out on osi at one point, but that was just the steam macro bc I've had it do that shit on many many servers where the targeting bugs out (when afk macroing skills). If you watch it says "target canceled" which is when a spell is successfully cast and then you cast another spell without selecting a target.The Silvertiger wrote: Cry me a river. It's kinda funny that Josh actually proves that OSI casting is buggy, but is in denial.
My video shows the difference in 2/6 on osi and demise. I think it's pretty clear that demise was eating some spells while the osi one wasn't, which the likely reason is the overcast penalty is slightly too high on demise for 2/6.
2/5 seems accurate, i said that before.
And get off my dick.
You found a bug with OSI casting where 2/5 was better than 2/6 therefore OSI casting is buggy. However, if we are going to have OSI-LIKE casting, I want it to be accurate. I don't know how many posts I have to make to get you to understand that.
I'm aware it sounds buggy, I am just pointing out the observations from testing, it's really not a matter up for debate so I dont get why you're arguing. Watch the video, 500 ms 2/6 > 2/5. If you watch eos's gif with 0ms delay 2/5 > 2/6. But timed correctly 2/6 > 2/5, that's how osi works and not how demise works currently (based on the video), and that is one thing that needs to be adjusted and I believe it's because the overcast feature is off, Morto pointed out at the beginning that the "random delay" they had implemented he didn't think was correct, maybe he was right, the video supports his hypothesis at least.The Silvertiger wrote:That sounds buggy to me. Listen to yourself:
holding a button down 2/5 is better than 2/6
You're supposed to recover faster on 2/6 whether timed right or not. I guess as Eos stated before implementing it to Occlo the overcast is buggy. If I were Eos and holding to the accurate without bugs, I would implement it without the overcast, but aren't you glad I'm not Eos even though you and your friends address us about the same.