event for sink gold

[MMMartin]

how about make DS evennnnnnnnt ,

now maybe make DS color for PETS COLORS, IT CAN BE REALLY COOL HAVE EVENT



have swap dragon glacial

[Veteran Noobie]

What about doing a cub event where you can turn gold in for item and it increases craft chance for lesser resist on weapon or less useful mod on armour?

[Ajani]

not trying to be rude but this is the stupidest thing I have heard

[Bama]

not trying to be rude but this is the stupidest thing I have heard

Opy has over 700 posts and this is the "stupidest thing"?

You are just not trying

[Tempest]

not trying to be rude but this is the stupidest thing I have heard

Opy has over 700 posts and this is the "stupidest thing"?

You are just not trying

You sure like to quote people.

[The Silvertiger]

You sure like to quote people.

Says the guy who quoted two people at once.

[Bama]

You sure like to quote people.

The irony .......

[zulu2401]

Bama can I buy you donuts?

[Made In Quebec]

To be honest, DS pets would be horrible. I hope I never see that on Demise, other than under gm's crotch.

a small one cause my ass barely can take much lol.

Interesting... that you are aware of such information

[Hugsforpeace]

You sure like to quote people.

Says the guy who quoted two people at once.

Rip bwahaha

[MMMartin]

lol, i find interesting HISTORY 'bag of sending'

http://www.uoguide.com/Bag_of_Sending


History
When first introduced in late 2002 as part of the When Ants Attack scenario, a bag of sending used one charge per item sent to your bank box.

With Publish 48 in November 2007, changes were made to the cost of transporting items. The formula became 1 charge for every 10 stones of Weight rounded up. For example, if you tried to send a 35 stone item, it would cost 4 charges. This made it impractical to send Gold (as every 50 pieces weighed a Stone each, 500 gold weighed 10 stones and used one charge, so only 15,000 gold could be sent with a fully charged bag! A character, on the other hand, could potentially carry around 25,000 gold at their limit).

In a November of 2007 Five on Friday, it was stated that slowing gold collection from monsters was indeed the primary reason for the change.

at 58 was return back, i think patch 58 was BUGED, if they thinking for future they will keep bag sending like it was in history
how about TEST this HISTORY, it can SINK GOLDS 90% on server,

with this change can make like 300 stone [45k gold] 30 use powder, it can be OP definitly stoped AFK farmer

[The Silvertiger]

It is a thought, but it wouldn't actually sink the gold. It would really kill the bos market which right now is pretty strong. 100k for an item that can send 1.8kk max. After change, would be a useless item that no one would want.

[MMMartin]

well if farming will reducent 95%, all prince will reduced, and maybe ppl will still farm, just all will more cheaper, bag sending can be farm without bag, aswell looting golds, it will still popular make mushorm+golds, so it will still make, and if bag will change for 300 refreshing use it can really good, it can sink golds for sure

[zulu2401]

WTF AM I READING? WTF IS REDUCENT? WTF IS MURSHORM?

[The Silvertiger]

well if farming will reducent 95%, all prince will reduced, and maybe ppl will still farm, just all will more cheaper, bag sending can be farm without bag, aswell looting golds, it will still popular make mushorm+golds, so it will still make, and if bag will change for 300 refreshing use it can really good, it can sink golds for sure

A gold sink is where the gold gets deleted or put out of circulation.

I'm pretty sure no one would want to use a bos to send 360,000 and buy them for 100k...